I want to make it completely clear about my situation as I have read a lot of lies and nonsense over the last few days
When released from Chelsea last year at the end of my contract I signed a commitment to play in NYCFC for two years starting January 1st 2015. I was then offered the chance to train and be a part of the Man City squad in the interim to keep myself in the best shape going into New York.
This period has since been extended by Man City and I will now start playing for NYCFC at the end of this current Premier League season. There has always been a constant dialogue between all parties in this time to find the best solution for everyone.
I can say that I am very excited about arriving in New York and giving everything to the team to make us a success in the MLS as soon as possible. Thanks everyone for your ongoing support and I wish everyone a healthy and happy 2015.
由此有几个事实点：1. 兰帕德与纽约城所签署的并非Contract，而是Commitment，由2015年1月1日起为纽约城效力，为时两年。2. 兰帕德和曼城签订的合同起初为半年，并获延长至赛季结束。3. 纽约城和曼城之间并没有直接合同关系，所谓“租借"并不存在。4. 兰帕德将于今年7月1日起为纽约城效力。
个人观点：1. 所谓Commitment，个人理解应该只是意向性的协议，有可能不具有约束力，或者具有一定弹性。具体条款还不得而知。但从MLS和英超官方来看，法律上来讲并不违规。2.兰帕德和曼城签订的合同应该是正式合同，即从一般意义上来讲，兰帕德以自由球员身份转会至曼城（如果commitment没有法律上的约束力的话）。1月份合同延长至赛季结束，致使之前签订的Commitment推迟到7月份履行。3. 之前官方的“租借“用词是错误的，曼城内部和集团内部应该有人要为这次的纰漏负责。
这个只是猜测，并没有证实。个人觉得不管签没签，对现在的情况来讲影响不大。现在最关键的问题是官方如何解释信息前后不一致的情况。作者: Munchen86 时间: 2015-1-9 23:28
兰帕德最好再和曼城续约一年
连纽约城都别去
管其他球迷怎么说
一年后直接在曼城退役后进入教练组当助教
他这几年的英超及欧战经验
以及在切尔西时的防守经历
再跟在工程师后面学两年进攻战术
他又是高智商+英格兰人
以后对曼城集团的助益只会比埃维拉更高作者: kyoway 时间: 2015-1-9 23:30
曼城官方出声明了。
The statement on the NYCFC website in July saying Lampard’s two-year contract took effect from Aug 1, 2014 was a mistake. [The] initial statement on City’s website that it was a loan was also an error.
There was never a break clause in Lampard’s contract dated 31 December - [there was a] short-term contract with City [that] only ran to Dec 31
There was a head of terms commitment from Lampard to join NYCFC from Jan 1, 2015. That was extended to the end of this season. Any contract with NYCFC will now take effect from July 1, 2015.
The Premier League statement is correct but was a very specific, legal phrasing. Might seem confusing to laymen like us but was agreed by PL lawyers and is right.
基本内容与兰帕德的声明一致，并承认此前纽约城和曼城对兰帕德加盟的新闻稿有误。
曼城现在最好的做法是静候发展
要是埃维拉现在出来讲那些话是对兰帕德落井下石
就怕搞得他在曼城或是纽约城都混不下去了
静观其变吧
纽约城现在可能很尴尬
但对曼城没有任何影响
如果车子依然接纳他
那兰帕德退役以后可以回去切尔西任职
不过接下来的一年半他依然是为天蓝效力
如果切尔西反他
那城市集团肯定会全力招揽他的作者: 摇晃的莴苣菇凉 时间: 2015-1-9 23:57 引用21楼 @mv_jason 发表的:
曼城官方出声明了。
The statement on the NYCFC website in July saying Lampard’s two-year contract took effect from Aug 1, 2014 was a mistake. [The] initial statement on City’s website that it was a loan was also an error.
There was never a break clause in Lampard’s contract dated 31 December - [there was a] short-term contract with City [that] only ran to Dec 31
There was a head of terms commitment from Lampard to join NYCFC from Jan 1, 2015. That was extended to the end of this season. Any contract with NYCFC will now take effect from July 1, 2015.
The Premier League statement is correct but was a very specific, legal phrasing. Might seem confusing to laymen like us but was agreed by PL lawyers and is right.
基本内容与兰帕德的声明一致，并承认此前纽约城和曼城对兰帕德加盟的新闻稿有误。
你误会我的意思了我的意思是之后维埃拉可以找蓝爸爸谈之后的规划，像兰帕德这种聪明人都是走一歩看三步的。脑子清楚得很。作者: gingermoggy 时间: 2015-1-10 00:05
本来 signed a commitment，但NYCFC网页偏说contract took effect有什么办法，就是欺骗球迷也是他们，又不是一家俱乐部，还要为纽约城队错误负责吗？ 作者: mv_jason 时间: 2015-1-10 00:09 引用27楼 @云遏 发表的:
本来 signed a commitment，但NYCFC网页偏说contract took effect有什么办法，就是欺骗球迷也是他们，又不是一家俱乐部，还要为纽约城队错误负责吗？
